From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21008 invoked by alias); 6 May 2009 16:54:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 20989 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2009 16:54:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 May 2009 16:54:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0BF02BAB40; Wed, 6 May 2009 12:54:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Ur9tkps3e4AF; Wed, 6 May 2009 12:54:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8AA2BAB36; Wed, 6 May 2009 12:54:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 95A72F5900; Wed, 6 May 2009 09:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 16:54:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pierre Muller Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove last occurences of target_{insert/remove}_watchpoint Message-ID: <20090506165425.GO10734@adacore.com> References: <001a01c9c39f$e3f217c0$abd64740$@u-strasbg.fr> <200904300000.26661.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200905042033.09398.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200905042033.09398.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2 > I've just ran this version through sparc solaris 8, and > it survived without regressions (although it looks like solaris test > results got much worse somewhere along these last weeks -- around > 1300 fails), and watchpoints still work. Joel, would you like to > take a look at this and/or ran it on mips-irix? I won't have much time in the next few weeks, unfortunately :-(. But I did run it through the testsuite. The results are really abysmal but no regression. # of expected passes 8361 # of unexpected failures 2114 # of unexpected successes 4 # of expected failures 33 # of known failures 29 # of unresolved testcases 33 # of untested testcases 72 # of unsupported tests 30 -- Joel