From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11082 invoked by alias); 6 May 2009 16:15:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 10844 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2009 16:15:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 May 2009 16:15:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836AC2BAB58; Wed, 6 May 2009 12:15:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id MSauuEtCLtIX; Wed, 6 May 2009 12:15:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CA42BAB51; Wed, 6 May 2009 12:15:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 69193F5900; Wed, 6 May 2009 09:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 16:15:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' , 'Tom Tromey' , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Change OK: to ARI: for ARI rule ignore Message-ID: <20090506161531.GK10734@adacore.com> References: <001901c9c399$81854fe0$848fefa0$@u-strasbg.fr> <002a01c9c3df$d77f5760$867e0620$@u-strasbg.fr> <007501c9c533$d0a9c240$71fd46c0$@u-strasbg.fr> <013301c9ca35$482bd780$d8838680$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <013301c9ca35$482bd780$d8838680$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 > Is this OK for everyone? Sure. Not sure if you meant to keep the commented-out debug code in your patch, but looks OK otherwise. -- Joel