From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10751 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2009 16:42:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 10732 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2009 16:42:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:42:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF0C2BAAEF; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:42:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id n0e0oiIx3tA6; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:42:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F76B2BAC6D; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:42:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A8F59F5924; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:42:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Change OK: to ARI: for ARI rule ignore Message-ID: <20090423164223.GB7552@adacore.com> References: <001901c9c399$81854fe0$848fefa0$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00652.txt.bz2 > Pierre> Thus, I would like to restrict that rule to only accept > Pierre> /* ARI: rule_name */. > > I think this sounds like a good idea. Seconded. > Pierre> The main problem if I commit both before next release is that, > Pierre> if ARI is rerun on gdb 6.8 release, this change will generate > Pierre> new false warnings. > > Is that something we would want to do? Can't we just run it once, say > today, and save the results? I mean, if that is something we need. I'm wondering - how did the gdb-6.8 ARI results get computed and published. Was this done automatically? -- Joel