From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5276 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2009 15:49:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 5265 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2009 15:49:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:49:12 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C0410A2C; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:49:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547F910A05; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:49:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lvvk5-0001PG-4H; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:49:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:49:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [FYI] Inlining support, rough patch Message-ID: <20090420154909.GA5386@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080613152754.GA4220@caradoc.them.org> <20080715192020.GB3094@caradoc.them.org> <200807172353.m6HNr1nY015884@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080718130308.GA19045@caradoc.them.org> <200807251446.m6PEkfwc027635@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080725174636.GB2433@caradoc.them.org> <200903312042.n2VKgIUx003764@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200903312042.n2VKgIUx003764@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00509.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:42:18PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > I agree that it is an important feature. I'll see if I can wrap my > head around this again now that I'm not in an airport every other > week again. Hi Mark, Did you have a chance to look at this? If not, maybe we can find a third party to review the patch? If someone volunteers, I'll refresh the diffs from our internal tree. Nothing algorithmic has changed, but we have a few bug fixes and improved testcases. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery