From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7382 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2009 18:00:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 7369 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Apr 2009 18:00:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_45,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:00:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 9241 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2009 18:00:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 19 Apr 2009 18:00:43 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, danny.backx@scarlet.be Subject: Re: patch: Windows CE on x86 Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:00:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <1239994229.8895.340.camel@dannypc> <200904172044.33672.pedro@codesourcery.com> <1240030749.8895.343.camel@dannypc> In-Reply-To: <1240030749.8895.343.camel@dannypc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904191901.05312.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00497.txt.bz2 On Saturday 18 April 2009 05:59:08, Danny Backx wrote: > On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 20:44 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > > > I know that this is mostly copy&paste from the arm-mingw32ce > > configuration, so I think it can pass by without a copyright > > assignment. In any case, do you have one in place with the FSF? > > I've always been lazy :-) > I'll get it done now though. Thanks, that's great. I don't think I know if I have access to the forms. Could someone please send him the forms? > > Just a small curiosity question before I apply this, is > > there a reason this is: > > An attempt on my part to generalize further. Feel free to remove convert > it to mingw32ce if you think that's better. I've committed the patch with that change. Thanks! -- Pedro Alves