From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24006 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2009 15:50:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 23998 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2009 15:50:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:49:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E35D2BACB1; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:49:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZmWf21yA8lGY; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:49:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399872BACA9; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:49:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DAA31F58C1; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:50:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] print error message if (auto) disassembly failed Message-ID: <20090417154951.GT7585@adacore.com> References: <20090416173918.GP7557@adacore.com> <834owolc51.fsf@gnu.org> <20090416180146.GH7585@adacore.com> <831vrslb0f.fsf@gnu.org> <20090416190654.GJ7585@adacore.com> <83vdp4jn6j.fsf@gnu.org> <20090416235735.GO7585@adacore.com> <83r5zrk52f.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83r5zrk52f.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00440.txt.bz2 > > (gdb) core core > > warning: core file may not match specified executable file. > > Core was generated by `./crash'. > > Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. > > #0 0x00007fe6fe543307 in ?? () > > 0x00007fe6fe543307: (cannot read memory) > > Fine with me, although "cannot read memory" is a bit more general, > English-wise, than the actual cause, which is that this specific > address is unreadable. I did not line "address unreadable" because we weren't reading an address, we were reading the memory at that address, shown on the left hand side. That's why I proposed this instead, which in my opinion is more accurate. -- Joel