From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4499 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2009 14:33:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 4478 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2009 14:33:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:33:18 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC87A10B71; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:33:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5BF10967; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:33:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lup7z-0000HA-V8; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:33:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Mention all new options in NEWS Message-ID: <20090417143315.GB32335@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <83k55jk2a1.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83k55jk2a1.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00433.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 01:22:46PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I was looking for the exact form of the disassemble-next-line option > (I forgot its precise name), and found out that we don't have it > listed in NEWS. > > Would it be OK with everybody to request that new options be also > mentioned in NEWS, in addition to new commands? If others agree, I > volunteer to document in NEWS all the options we added since GDB 6.8. I completely agree. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery