From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22570 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2009 23:59:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 22562 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2009 23:59:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:59:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B612BAC72; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:59:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UgidILnMzFWS; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:59:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980122BAC70; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:59:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3AA98F58C1; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:59:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:59:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey , teawater@gmail.com Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] print error message if (auto) disassembly failed Message-ID: <20090416235944.GP7585@adacore.com> References: <20090416173918.GP7557@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00405.txt.bz2 > The default is "auto", which means: > > If AUTO (which is the default), or there's no line info to determine > the source line of the next instruction, display disassembly of next > instruction instead. */ > > But I agree with you that this is the wrong default. > I think the default should be "off". Would anyone object to changing the default to "off"? -- Joel