From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-62989-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14290 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2009 19:07:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 14211 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2009 19:07:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:07:00 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 	by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0092BAC6B; 	Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:06:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) 	by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) 	with LMTP id I-ClvW8KkZbU; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:06:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 	by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0B02BAC6F; 	Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:06:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) 	id 6ED37F58C1; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:07:00 -0000
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] print error message if (auto) disassembly failed
Message-ID: <20090416190654.GJ7585@adacore.com>
References: <20090416173918.GP7557@adacore.com> <834owolc51.fsf@gnu.org> <20090416180146.GH7585@adacore.com> <831vrslb0f.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <831vrslb0f.fsf@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00383.txt.bz2

> But an invalid address can sometimes (accidentally) be readable,
> right?  What will we print then?

It looks like this "(bad)" is printed by opcode, not GDB.
So we should get your "(bad)" output if the address is valid
but points to an invalid instruction.

-- 
Joel