From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32196 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2009 22:29:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 32187 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Apr 2009 22:29:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:29:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FEE72BAC2B; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:29:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id L1lrCk6IHzIw; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:29:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE14B2BAC27; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:29:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7F9BFF5BA6; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:29:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: DWARF-related warnings in DJGPP build of GDB Message-ID: <20090415222936.GD7585@adacore.com> References: <834owqmdli.fsf@gnu.org> <20090415162242.GC7585@adacore.com> <83k55llnv6.fsf@gnu.org> <83iql5llja.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83iql5llja.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00359.txt.bz2 > Thanks. readelf is out, because DJGPP uses COFF. "objdump -W" (with > a recent enough Binutils ;-) seems to do the job, thanks. How to use > the info it dumps on me to track down my particular problems is > another matter. Hmmm... You can search for that function that GDB complained about, and look at the address attributes for the function itself, as well as any inner block (DW_TAG_lexical_block is would imagine). -- Joel