From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27461 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2009 06:38:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 27453 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Apr 2009 06:38:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:38:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926A32BAB96; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:38:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9xkPDKk5eHlF; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:38:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577D72BAB35; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:38:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 33621F5BA6; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:38:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdbadmin/ss/gdb_ari.sh obsolete->regression Message-ID: <20090415063807.GB7585@adacore.com> References: <007101c9bd46$f8fb9f10$eaf2dd30$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <007101c9bd46$f8fb9f10$eaf2dd30$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2 > I committed the following patch that transforms all obsolete > gdb_ari.sh script entries that had zero count into regression entries. > > This allows to show more strongly any reuse of such obsolete > function/macros. Errr, I'm having this most wonderful thoughts, right now. Since these macros are no longer used, can't we just delete whatever still left of them (including documentation), and then remove them from the ARI? It's late and I'm tired, so I'm hoping I haven't started dreaming yet :-). -- Joel