From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20329 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2009 23:41:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 20311 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2009 23:41:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:41:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093B92BABC1; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:41:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id BIKbBpU96H4d; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:41:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DF72BAB7D; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:41:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4DB73F5BA6; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:41:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis , muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr, gdb@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB ARIndex Linux rule cleanup Message-ID: <20090414234126.GA7585@adacore.com> References: <000001c9ae14$24fb7cd0$6ef27670$@u-strasbg.fr> <007301c9bd55$a66e8320$f34b8960$@u-strasbg.fr> <200904142322.n3ENMavx022534@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200904150038.18511.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200904150038.18511.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00289.txt.bz2 > I agree. There's no scope for confusion over what "Linux" is > refering to here. I would tend to agree too. But I'm wondering if this is not a requirement from RMS for all GNU projects... -- Joel