From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6147 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2009 19:36:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 6133 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Apr 2009 19:36:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:36:01 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5741106A4; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:35:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1C410631; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:35:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ls02W-0007C9-FF; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:35:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio_Durigan_J=FAnior?= Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] catch syscall -- try 4 -- Architecture-independent part Message-ID: <20090409193556.GA27633@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio_Durigan_J=FAnior?= , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1232929831.26873.22.camel@miki> <200901260053.06295.pedro@codesourcery.com> <1232945747.26873.27.camel@miki> <1232989355.26873.39.camel@miki> <20090201193306.GJ4597@caradoc.them.org> <1235561189.14363.20.camel@miki> <20090227221133.GA12904@caradoc.them.org> <1238352626.23609.14.camel@miki> <20090331154452.GA13260@caradoc.them.org> <1239305373.6452.13.camel@miki> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1239305373.6452.13.camel@miki> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:29:33PM -0300, Sérgio Durigan Júnior wrote: > So this is my opinion about this: I have the complete catch syscall > patch here (the only thing that's missing is the MI support), so what do > you think if we just push this patch upstream as-is (which is: in a > pretty good shape, as far as I understood the others developers' -- > including yours -- comments), and postpone this MI support? I think I > should be able to sit down and implement this support until the end of > this semester, is it good for you? Yes, that's fine. If someone else needs it, they'll fill it in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery