From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19919 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2009 21:57:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 19911 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Apr 2009 21:57:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:57:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7921A2BABDA; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:57:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id AKfGCnfbCbiU; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:57:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3DC2BABBB; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:57:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C593BF5A13; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:57:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Andr? P?nitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Implement -exec-jump Message-ID: <20090408215744.GH7535@adacore.com> References: <200904080950.16691.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200904081108.17248.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <837i1v627o.fsf@gnu.org> <200904081116.41983.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <833acj5wdi.fsf@gnu.org> <1239227439.8871.153.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1239227439.8871.153.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00161.txt.bz2 > Another way to do it would be to add pending items to a GDB release wiki > page. Joel already uses this, in fact. So it's the easiest to implement. This mechanism is fine as far as I am concerned. -- Joel