From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27949 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2009 16:35:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 27940 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Apr 2009 16:35:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate6.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate6.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.155) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:35:08 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate6.de.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n33GYOKM508656 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:34:24 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n33GYOQD4411516 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 18:34:24 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n33GYOqT013032 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 18:34:24 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id n33GYNYG013021 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 18:34:23 +0200 Message-Id: <200904031634.n33GYNYG013021@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:34:23 +0200 Subject: siginfo patches cause testsuite failure? To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:35:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 Hello, I'm getting the following test suite failure: FAIL: gdb.base/default.exp: show convenience The testcase issues "show convenience" in a freshly started GDB, and expects the result "No debugger convenience variables now defined." etc. However, with a current GDB, we get instead: (gdb) show convenience $_siginfo = void I guess in a way that is to be expected, as we now *have* this convenience variable always defined ... Should the test case be updated? Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com