From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4676 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2009 03:17:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 4665 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Apr 2009 03:17:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_73,J_CHICKENPOX_83 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:17:11 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC1C10A5B; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:17:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F0E10A46; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:17:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LpDQQ-0004PS-Q0; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 23:17:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:17:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Keith Seitz Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Special casing dtors? Message-ID: <20090402031706.GA16898@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Keith Seitz , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <49CAB139.8010100@redhat.com> <49CD2F0F.8040203@redhat.com> <49CDD4C1.1080306@redhat.com> <200903301658.16807.pedro@codesourcery.com> <49D3FCC9.7090505@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49D3FCC9.7090505@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 04:46:17PM -0700, Keith Seitz wrote: > I've attached a secondary patch for stabsread.c which not only fixes the > failing tests you found (with -gstabs+), but also fixes tons of other > failures in classes.exp and virtfunc.exp (and more). Again, don't ask me > why. The fix seems innocently isolated enough, but it just reduces the > number of failed tests from >400 to just over 300. I don't understand the patch - would you mind posting affected stabs from 4.2 and HEAD? Sounds like GCC made the incompatible change here, not GDB. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery