> Can't we instead remove "current" from the link, and say somewhere that
> this is not the path that GDB is now following?  Perhaps a short sensence
> below the link?

Here is a new version of the patch. Does this look better?
Not being around when libgdb was being discussed, I hope that
the note that I wrote about it is accurate. Please let me know
if not.

        * documentation/index.html: Remove link to the libgdb documentation.
        * papers/index.hmtl: Show the second libgdb paper as deprecated.
        * papers/libgdb2/index.html: Add a note saying that this project
        has been abandoned.

Thanks,
-- 
Joel