From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31159 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2009 19:05:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 31138 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2009 19:05:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_93,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:05:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 925 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2009 19:05:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 27 Mar 2009 19:05:33 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Keith Seitz Subject: Re: [RFC] Special casing dtors? Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <49CAB139.8010100@redhat.com> <200903271734.56216.pedro@codesourcery.com> <49CD200D.6050206@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <49CD200D.6050206@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903271905.40463.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00640.txt.bz2 On Friday 27 March 2009 18:50:53, Keith Seitz wrote: > Pedro Alves wrote: > > > I just confirmed this on x86-linux, to remove 64-bit out of > > the picture. > > Okay, we have a problem. My machines show exactly the OPPOSITE behavior: > templates.exp "destructor breakpoint" test KFAILs on both x86 and x86_64 > GNU/Linux. After the patch, this test PASSes on both machines. The other > failure you had (templates.exp value method breakpoint) PASSes on both > machines before and after the patch. With stabs? FSF GDB? I *do* see that with dwarf. I'll see if I can try this on x86-cygwin, which is currently still using gcc-3.4/stabs by default. > I can only guess that this has something to do with gcc... I'm using the > F10 compiler, gcc version 4.3.2 20081105 (Red Hat 4.3.2-7). I'm on ubuntu 8.04, gcc version 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu3). Actually, I didn't try x86, but "x86_64 -m32", but I don't think it makes a difference in this case. -- Pedro Alves