From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27499 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2009 16:00:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 27471 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2009 16:00:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:00:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C5A2BAB61; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:00:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Yy0QaTrvQT8s; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:00:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3A92BAC37; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:00:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 69A815BD21; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:04:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB ARIndex cleanup Message-ID: <20090327160004.GT9472@adacore.com> References: <000001c9ae14$24fb7cd0$6ef27670$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090326230959.GN9472@adacore.com> <001201c9aeb5$44ece820$cec6b860$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001201c9aeb5$44ece820$cec6b860$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00628.txt.bz2 > As Daniel seems to think that is can be useful (maybe for non GNU > compilers?) should we use some configure set macro like INLINE that > would be set to nothing for GNU gcc but could be inline for other > compilers? I personally don't see the benefit. I propose we leave things as they are for now and remove the rule about the use of inline. Daniel? -- Joel