From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20060 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2009 15:39:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 20049 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2009 15:39:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:39:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF6B2BAB95; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:39:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id WihEE6PbaCDM; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:39:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED122BAB57; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:39:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD8615BD21; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:41:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Keith Seitz Subject: Re: [RFC] Special casing dtors? Message-ID: <20090327153933.GQ9472@adacore.com> References: <49CAB139.8010100@redhat.com> <20090327022150.GC29050@caradoc.them.org> <49CC3B5D.3060706@redhat.com> <200903271439.40901.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200903271439.40901.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00624.txt.bz2 > I regtested the whole testsuite with stabs on x86_64-linux, and > got this with your patch: Does stabs actually work on 64bit? I know there's been an extension for Tru64, but how about GNU/Linux? On my machine, I get disastrous results compared to 32bit Linux. -- Joel