From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16337 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2009 20:01:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 16115 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Mar 2009 20:01:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:00:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 31287 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2009 20:00:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 25 Mar 2009 20:00:54 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: don't let CHECK_TYPEDEF yield a value Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:10:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903252000.52990.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00562.txt.bz2 Pm Wednesday 25 March 2009 19:43:27, Tom Tromey wrote: > Let me know what you think. Makes sense to me. -- Pedro Alves