Re: [patch] Fix `return' of long/long-long results with no debuginfo

Jan Kratochvil
2009-02-11T22:08:37Z

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:22:41 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
# I disagree. I think it is the behaviour that makes the most sense in
# a historical context. And I have a (somewhat) vague recollection that

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:57:51 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Sorry Jan, are you really just ignoring my remarks and actually making
> this diff more unacceptable to me?

I cannot agree GDB should prefer to simulate the K&R C behavior over ANSI/ISO
C behavior. Sure I do not have the approval right so I will do anything I am
told with the patch to check it in. Still FYI so far I has not been convinced
to change my opinion on this (K&R vs. ANSI/ISO C) specific subject.

I am sorry if spending the time to read my patch was not acceptable for you.

Regards,
Jan