From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7051 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2009 20:13:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 7043 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2009 20:13:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:12:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2HKCYBf007324; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:12:34 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2HKCZjt027624; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:12:36 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2HKCVu9028459; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:12:32 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) id n2HKCV0x028453; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:12:31 +0100 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:23:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] New gdb_usleep function? Message-ID: <20090317201231.GA26985@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20090317161240.GB31959@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090317161240.GB31959@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2 On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:12:40 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > +++ b/gdb/gdb_usleep.c ... > +#include "defs.h" > +#include "gdb_select.h" Missing #include "gdb_usleep.h" to crosscheck the gdb_usleep prototype. But maybe just include it in already host-independent utils.c? Thanks, Jan