From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15170 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2009 19:41:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 15161 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2009 19:41:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:41:00 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B96104B5; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:40:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64659101AB; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:40:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ljf9l-0006z3-Jr; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:40:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [gdbserver/RFA] pave way for multi-process, s/process/lwp/g Message-ID: <20090317194057.GA26828@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200903171931.31390.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200903171931.31390.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00326.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 07:31:31PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > What do you think? OK? Agreed - this is fine. I know there are a lot of outstanding gdbserver patches right now. It's completely fine with me for someone else to review them; I can't see any way I'll have time to catch up. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery