From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7891 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2009 07:29:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 7870 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2009 07:29:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:29:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 29433 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2009 07:29:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wind.localnet) (vladimir@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 17 Mar 2009 07:29:33 -0000 From: Vladimir Prus To: Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [2/3] broken -thread-info output in non-stop mode, suppress_resume_observer Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:33:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.90 (Linux/2.6.24-24-generic; KDE/4.2.65; i686; svn-936416; 2009-03-07) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200903170623.06435.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200903170623.06435.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200903171029.31690.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00305.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 17 March 2009 09:23:06 Pedro Alves wrote: > This gives the suppress_resume_observer a similar treatment. > > Instead of suppressing the observer call, we make the observers > themselves know when to ignore the event. > > Vladimir, could you please take a look? I'd appreciate > comments from others too, of course. I am not sure what is saved_in_infcall -- can we really do an infcall while in the middle of another infcall? Otherwise, I think this is fine. - Volodya