From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21517 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2009 03:15:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 21465 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2009 03:15:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:15:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 17880 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2009 03:15:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 17 Mar 2009 03:15:11 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Doug Evans Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix compiling amd64-linux-nat.c on old glibcs [was Re: new siginfo support doesn't build on glibc 2.2.2] Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:14:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903170315.08566.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 17 March 2009 00:05:01, Doug Evans wrote: > How about this? Sure, thanks! > 2009-03-16 Doug Evans > > * amd64-linux-nat.c (si_timerid,si_overrun): Provide definition for > glibc 2.3.2 and earlier. -- Pedro Alves