From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14654 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2009 22:18:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 14646 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Mar 2009 22:17:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:17:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3158F2BAB45; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:17:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id V+i7eghPfReo; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:17:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62EA2BAB43; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:17:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D217FF5C3F; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:22:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Tom Tromey , Mark Kettenis , drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix `return' of long/long-long results with no debuginfo Message-ID: <20090314221745.GA14183@adacore.com> References: <200903042129.n24LTUKa000770@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20090309015510.GA28986@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <200903092233.n29MXEfG019900@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20090311163024.GA25708@adacore.com> <20090311205901.GB25708@adacore.com> <20090313171134.GA4396@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20090313224653.GA30693@adacore.com> <20090314214401.GA18006@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090314214401.GA18006@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 > The statement `no debugging info' itself is too ambiguous. I had a > mess in it myself some years ago and I still find people do not > properly distinguish .symtab/.dynsym/.debug_info, which of these are > ELF vs. DWARF, gcc (none)/-s/-g/strip and how they are related to GDB > minimal_symbol/partial_symbol/symbol. No problem with your version. The reason why I wondered whether this was necessary or not is that I assumed that the testsuite scripts are going to be read mostly by GDB developers... -- Joel