From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23898 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2009 10:19:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 23889 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Mar 2009 10:19:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:19:14 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2DAJ5GA018234; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:19:05 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2DAJ5dM018729; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:19:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:34:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200903131019.n2DAJ5dM018729@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <000001c9a3b1$98a63ca0$c9f2b5e0$@u-strasbg.fr> (muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) Subject: Re: [RFC] Set I386_USE_GENERIC_WATCHPOINTS in configure References: <000901c9a372$89647070$9c2d5150$@u-strasbg.fr> <200903130102.50004.pedro@codesourcery.com> <000001c9a3b1$98a63ca0$c9f2b5e0$@u-strasbg.fr> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 > From: "Pierre Muller" > Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:59:11 +0100 > > With my patch, we would also simply > use the same file for windows gdbserver. > My earlier RFC does almost the same change in gdbserver directory. > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00206.html > The only change was for the debug printing, but this can also > be easily taken care of by so function variable. I think it would be a mistake to make gdbserver use the same code as gdb itself here.