From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22638 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2009 05:43:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 22628 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2009 05:43:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:43:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285712BABDD; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:43:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9xZxko1Pk2ml; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:43:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87B42BAAE1; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:43:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 86017E7ACD; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:43:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:02:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fix most -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations warnings Message-ID: <20090220054304.GA22307@adacore.com> References: <200902180201.05118.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20090220000902.GA6428@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00404.txt.bz2 > I thought perhaps you'd want to wire it into > ada_lookup_partial_symbol, replacing default_print_typedef. > But I don't know Ada and if the default is ok with you... I didn't actually think that far... Maybe it would make sense indeed, but so far, it looks like we've been able to do without for quite a while, so maybe it isn't needed? I mean, I looked at the original implementation before this language method got added, and Ada was already an unsupported language for that routine. (sound of a broom pushing dust under the carpet) -- Joel