From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20647 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2009 19:08:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 20638 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Feb 2009 19:08:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:08:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 9840 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2009 19:08:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wind.local) (vladimir@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 17 Feb 2009 19:08:47 -0000 From: Vladimir Prus To: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: MI solib notification Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, nickrob@snap.net.nz References: <200901310010.46738.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20090201182917.GF4597@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20090201182917.GF4597@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902172208.37427.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00355.txt.bz2 On Sunday 01 February 2009 21:29:18 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 08:22:28PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > That'd be okay as well, although I don't really understand why it is > > better than my suggestion. > > It's not a big difference; I find it more natural to have the output > all grouped together and looking similar to GDB's expected output. I'd prefer this approach to, because that's how the rest of MI docs do it. But -- who to I force a break inside @item ? - Volodya