From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31003 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2009 18:15:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 30995 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Feb 2009 18:15:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:15:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 10787 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2009 18:15:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 17 Feb 2009 18:15:08 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: "Marc Khouzam" Subject: Re: Process exit in multi-process, and gdb's selected thread. Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200902170058.33653.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200902171633.15303.pedro@codesourcery.com> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06F3083D@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06F3083D@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902171815.11680.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 17 February 2009 17:08:04, Marc Khouzam wrote: > At first glance, things look very good. I was able to detach from > all processes and re-attach. When detached from all processes, I ran > the 'info threads' commands and the result was empty, so I know there > was not thread selected. But I did not get any errors and was able > to attach/detach, multiple times. > That's very good to know, thanks! > The only thing that gave me trouble was that auto-attach was triggered > from my Stub but I don't think HEAD deals with it perfectly, so I got > "No registers" when running -list-thread-groups after an auto-attach. Yep, that's expected with HEAD. > Bottom line is that this patch is very promising. > Good stuff! > Great! -- Pedro Alves