From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26891 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2009 19:56:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 26883 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2009 19:56:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:56:31 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3846107F8; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:56:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCF6107F2; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:56:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LXhfh-00086c-1I; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:56:29 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Tom Tromey Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: MI solib notification Message-ID: <20090212195629.GA31140@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Tromey , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200901310010.46738.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200902121801.55254.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20090212151337.GA9460@caradoc.them.org> <200902121806.45822.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:43:29PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: > > Pedro> I'd prefer in these cases to see us move in the direction where > Pedro> the observer itself has the needed information to decide if it > Pedro> should skip its whatever-action, or, to add a new > Pedro> notification. > > I completely agree. Also, I'd like us to agree that this is a rule > that we'll apply in the future. FWIW my impression is that we have > been moving in this direction already. I agree too; I was clearly wrong here. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery