From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4359 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2009 15:13:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 4347 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2009 15:13:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_13 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:13:40 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B64107F8; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:13:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8A2107F2; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:13:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LXdFx-0002Yy-Il; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:13:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:13:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: Marc Khouzam , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Nick Roberts Subject: Re: MI solib notification Message-ID: <20090212151337.GA9460@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , Marc Khouzam , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Nick Roberts References: <200901310010.46738.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200902121212.53025.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20090212132247.GA3107@caradoc.them.org> <200902121801.55254.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200902121801.55254.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00285.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:01:54PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Yes, this runs everywhere except a.out and marks all breakpoints in solibs > disabled, without printing any messages. *Then* we look over all solibs > and call observer, but since all breakpoints are already disabled, > breakpoint.c:disable_breakpoints_in_unloaded_shlib won't do anything, > and won't say anything either. I see. The comment in clear_solibs means that we will break SunOS a.out shared libraries if we do this; they were previously not disabled, since they won't ever be re-enabled. So I suggest not making the observer call on a.out either. Otherwise OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery