From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8359 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2009 20:46:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 8351 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Feb 2009 20:46:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:46:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB59C2A96BE; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:46:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uGs+9pAy-yqv; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:46:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583D82A96B5; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:46:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F83CE7ACD; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:46:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:46:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann , Eli Zaretskii , Daniel Jacobowitz , pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: add ability to "source" Python code Message-ID: <20090211204640.GD13021@adacore.com> References: <200902100000.22671.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200902100235.59897.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20090210034834.GA20077@caradoc.them.org> <1234267091.13871.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090211060911.GB4225@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2 > I also do not want to override the objections of other maintainers. > This is more important to me than this feature. Of course. Generally speaking, a disagreement is something that will happen once in a while. Now, we need to determine how strong the objections are. Sometimes, if they are only mild objections, perhaps we'll have to decide as a group that we want to move forward, even if some of us think that the solution is not ideal. In this specific situation, I am hoping that we haven't reached the point where we are no longer listening to each other. That's why I am keen on continuing the discussion a little longer. -- Joel