From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4468 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2009 15:53:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 4460 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Feb 2009 15:53:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:53:03 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650F7107D1; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:53:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BE510577; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:53:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LXHOW-0005uJ-VN; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:53:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:53:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vinay Sridhar Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch] Fix gdb failure to access tls data for parent thread Message-ID: <20090211155300.GA22689@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vinay Sridhar , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <200901091416.10563.vinay@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090204132851.GA9935@caradoc.them.org> <1234341068.13249.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1234341068.13249.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00239.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:01:08PM +0530, Vinay Sridhar wrote: > Daniel, > > Sorry for the late response. I can confirm that attach_thread is not > called on the parent thread. The test case I had listed in my earlier > mail uses OMP for thread creation. Could that have something to do with > this? Well, it shouldn't; libgomp uses the normal POSIX thread interfaces. I assume you're using GCC -fopenmp, right? Or is this another OpenMP implementation? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery