From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4168 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2009 19:04:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 4157 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Feb 2009 19:04:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:04:36 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E7B10A3D; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:04:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAC110A34; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:04:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LUQZU-0002yV-Uq; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:04:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [0/2] Inspect extra signal information Message-ID: <20090203190432.GA11419@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200902031501.49657.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200902031642.n13GgL35026175@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20090203180617.GA8038@caradoc.them.org> <200902031824.22132.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200902031824.22132.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 06:24:21PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 18:06:17, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > I like this idea.  We'd just need a "native siginfo to gdb siginfo" > > routine, which could probably live in one common native-only file. > > Hmmm, what do you mean exactly by "gdb siginfo" here? Whatever type you've constructed via the gdbarch. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery