Re: [0/2] Inspect extra signal information

Pedro Alves
2009-02-02T14:40:39Z

Hi guys, I'm looking at this again.

Given the argument that with this patch, the siginfo_t type before the signal
is delivered is the the same as what is seen on the signal handler, when
the signal is delivered to the inferior inferior, do you still think I
should change the type, or are you OK with how things are?

Is there anything else I should do to make this good to go?

Thanks,

--
Pedro Alves