From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8539 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2009 14:40:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 8530 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2009 14:40:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:40:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 21560 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 14:40:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 2 Feb 2009 14:40:31 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [0/2] Inspect extra signal information Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:40:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl References: <200901121846.51709.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200901131937.26135.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200901131946.44072.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200901131946.44072.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902021442.00407.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 Hi guys, I'm looking at this again. Given the argument that with this patch, the siginfo_t type before the signal is delivered is the the same as what is seen on the signal handler, when the signal is delivered to the inferior inferior, do you still think I should change the type, or are you OK with how things are? Is there anything else I should do to make this good to go? Thanks, -- Pedro Alves