From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30361 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2009 06:29:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 30352 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2009 06:29:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:28:30 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F77C10E25; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:28:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557E610635; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:28:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LLto5-0005Zv-Fq; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:28:21 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:29:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [RFA/win32] move win32_xfer_shared_library to (new) win32-tdep... Message-ID: <20090111062821.GA21427@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker References: <20090110090843.GB29274@adacore.com> <20090110165031.GB24850@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20090111041848.GQ24105@adacore.com> <20090111042411.GA8509@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090111042411.GA8509@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00239.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:24:11PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >In terms of the move itself, how do we want it to be done. > >CVS doesn't support moves per se. Usually, in my own little CVS > >repos where I don't use branches, I do a "mv" inside the CVS > >repository. But I know that this brings its own problems. > >Should we use "cvs remove + cvs add"? > > I don't know of any way to do a "mv" in CVS. If no one objects, I'll do > some surgery on the CVS repository to make a copy of windows-nat.c > and windows-tdep.c to make it look like they always existed and then > I'll cvs delete the old files and change Makefile.in. Someone had a script for this but I don't remember who... the above is what I usually do, but additionally remove tags from the new copies. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery