From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26712 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2009 16:53:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 26703 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2009 16:53:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-96-233-71-199.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (96.233.71.199) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:52:50 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC61813C028; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:52:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id EE7A42B385; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:52:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:53:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [RFA] Add support for 64bit Windows Message-ID: <20090110165240.GC24850@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker References: <20090110091316.GC29274@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090110091316.GC29274@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 01:13:16PM +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: >Hello, > >Unless I missed a patch in the series, this should be the final patch >that actually adds support for x86_64-windows... > >2009-01-10 Joel Brobecker > > * amd64-windows-nat.c, amd64-windows-tdep.c: New files. > * config/i386/mingw64.mh, config/i386/nm-cygwin64.h: New files. > * configure.host, configure.tgt: Add handling for x86_64/windows. > >Tested on Vista64. >OK to check in? These are fine modulo my previous concern - I don't want to be essentially duplicating very similar code in two different places. I don't think this change does that but I just wanted to make that point. cgf