Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Kai Tietz <Kai.Tietz@onevision.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC] convert a host address to a string
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090110071137.GN24105@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFA542D22E.A1D54DEA-ONC1257539.004F0A73-C1257539.004F65BE@onevision.de>

> I think it is a sub-optimal solution to have just support for Vista64, but 
> not for XP.

To me, the question is not about whether to support XP64 or not.
I agree it would be nice to support XP64 as well.  It's about who
has the time and energy to drive the discussion to find an accepted
solution.  I decided to drop XP64, because it's not in the list of
things I'm interested in while I'm sensing that it's going to take
a bit of effort to reach a consensus. You already made a very nice
contribution in the coff/pe reader, why not send another patch to
further improve host_address_to_string for XP64?

> On a second thought, I remembered, that bfd does things right ;) There
> is the macro sprintf_vma in bfd.h, which handles things pretty well
> and can be used here in utils.c, too.

The problem with that routine is that it is designed to print target
addresses, not host addresses.

-- 
Joel


  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-10  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-07 12:19 Joel Brobecker
2009-01-07 16:17 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-01-08 10:19   ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-08 10:25     ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-08 10:48       ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-08 11:02         ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-08 11:25           ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-08 11:31             ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-08 12:49           ` Mark Kettenis
2009-01-08 12:54             ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-08 13:04               ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-08 13:12               ` Mark Kettenis
2009-01-08 13:26     ` Mark Kettenis
2009-01-08 13:35       ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-08 13:42         ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-08 14:04           ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-08 16:18         ` Mark Kettenis
2009-01-08 16:23           ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-09  9:57             ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-09 10:05               ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-09 13:12       ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-09 14:28         ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-10  7:12           ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2009-01-10 13:31             ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-10 13:34               ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-10 13:58               ` Mark Kettenis
2009-01-10 14:04               ` Mark Kettenis
2009-01-10 14:15                 ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-10 14:22                   ` Mark Kettenis
2009-01-10 14:25                     ` Kai Tietz
2009-01-11 13:31                     ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-11 13:53                       ` Mark Kettenis
2009-01-13 12:09                     ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090110071137.GN24105@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=Kai.Tietz@onevision.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox