From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27740 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2009 11:13:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 27732 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2009 11:13:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_44 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:12:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E55B2A9654; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:12:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9HQYnLpOjJn1; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:12:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18812A9653; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:12:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 01C19E7ACD; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:12:40 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:13:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: teawater Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay third time, 1/9 Message-ID: <20090109111240.GK24105@adacore.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2 > +# For the process record and replay target. > +M:int:process_record:CORE_ADDR addr:addr > +M:void:process_record_dasm:void I haven't really followed the last discussions about recording and reverse debugging. If these two methods are the way we decide to go, could we document exactly what each method is expected to do? This will help future implementors, I think. -- Joel