From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26091 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2009 15:30:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 26080 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2009 15:30:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:30:43 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F0F10E71 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:30:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9306B10E24 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:30:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LKwqF-0001qp-JX for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:30:39 -0500 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] undefine SIGHUP if function kill not available... Message-ID: <20090108153039.GA7097@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20090107115832.GF1751@adacore.com> <20090108135131.GF20220@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090108135131.GF20220@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:51:31PM +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: > In any case, it looks relatively straightforward, but I'd rather > have the confirmation from someone who's experienced with signals. Looks fine to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery