From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16070 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2009 19:31:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 16054 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jan 2009 19:31:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:31:34 +0000 Received: (qmail 19634 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2009 19:31:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 5 Jan 2009 19:31:32 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: eliminate deprecated_add_set_cmd Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:31:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Thomas Schwinge , Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , ams@gnu.org References: <200812310114.45103.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20081231040958.GB31595@adacore.com> <20090104173520.GC26067@fencepost.gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <20090104173520.GC26067@fencepost.gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901051931.30871.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 On Sunday 04 January 2009 17:35:20, Thomas Schwinge wrote: [...] Okay, I think we're all in sync. > > Yes, and also perhaps indeed change the name to ``debug gnu-nat'', as > that's exactly what it does. Okay, I'll do that. Thanks. > Pedro, even if I don't expect any breakage, did you check your patch on a > GNU/Hurd system or shall I do so? The patch I posted didn't change the commands at all. I'll write a new one up, and I'll make sure it builds and works on GNU/Hurd before posting. I'll also adjust the docs. > Also, I found another (doc-only) reference of `deprecated_add_set_cmd' in > `valprint.c'. Yeah, I'd noticed that. That comment still has some relevance. I'll see about rewriting it a bit to not mention the two methods that have been removed since, but I may do that separatelly. -- Pedro Alves