From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-60752-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15102 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2008 22:52:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 15092 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Dec 2008 22:52:54 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:52:19 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBMMpoU7016911; 	Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:51:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mBMMpmml011982; 	Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:51:48 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:52:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200812222251.mBMMpmml011982@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: eliz@gnu.org
CC: drow@false.org, sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tromey@redhat.com,         msnyder@vmware.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl,         gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <umyendfad.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 23 	Dec 2008 00:19:06 +0200)
Subject: Re: RFC: "info proc map" for corefiles
References: <1229626216.6602.15.camel@miki> <494AC2D3.9090705@vmware.com> <1229702034.6602.18.camel@miki> <m3prjoi20v.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1229703833.6602.28.camel@miki> <uocz8dkjp.fsf@gnu.org> <1229960072.27356.0.camel@miki> <ur640c88f.fsf@gnu.org> <1229975651.27356.2.camel@miki> <uocz4c708.fsf@gnu.org> <20081222202532.GA31896@caradoc.them.org> <umyendfad.fsf@gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00398.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:19:06 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> 
> > Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:25:32 -0500
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio_Durigan_J=FAnior?= <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
> > 	tromey@redhat.com, msnyder@vmware.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl,
> > 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > 
> > I wonder if we should rename or redefine "info proc".  It is currently
> > /proc specific, so Sergio's new work for core files doesn't belong
> > there.  But while it exists we can't reasonably add a separate "info
> > process".
> > 
> > Or should we fold this into "info inferior" and make it work for other
> > kinds of inferiors?
> 
> I'm okay with both of these ways, but "info process" doesn't sound
> like a good name for core files, IMO.

Agreed