From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11518 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2008 16:04:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 11510 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2008 16:04:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:03:43 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBJG3bhx027900; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:03:37 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mBJG3aZ4021289; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:03:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:04:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200812191603.mBJG3aZ4021289@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com CC: msnyder@vmware.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <1229702034.6602.18.camel@miki> (message from =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Durigan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FAnior?= on Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:53:54 -0200) Subject: Re: RFC: "info proc map" for corefiles References: <1229620702.6602.12.camel@miki> <200812181846.mBIIkTgK015985@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1229626216.6602.15.camel@miki> <494AC2D3.9090705@vmware.com> <1229702034.6602.18.camel@miki> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00346.txt.bz2 > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Durigan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FAnior?= > Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:53:54 -0200 > > Hi Michael, > > On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 13:38 -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > > "info core"? > > > > There are probably a bunch of things we could expose about a > > core file that would not make sense for a process, and vice versa. > > Ok, I'll create the "info core" command for that. Thanks for the > comment. "info core" sounds reasonable to me