Re: [RFA] Improve comment in linux-low.c:handle_extended_wait

Michael Snyder
2008-12-18T19:19:16Z

Looks fine.

Doug Evans wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is a minor cleanup to a comment.
> What "it" is isn't clear.
>
> Ok to check in?
>
> 2008-12-13 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
>
> * linux-low.c (handle_extended_wait): Improve comment.
>
> Index: linux-low.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.84
> diff -u -p -r1.84 linux-low.c
> --- linux-low.c 12 Dec 2008 23:14:28 -0000 1.84
> +++ linux-low.c 13 Dec 2008 21:28:12 -0000
> @@ -180,7 +180,8 @@ handle_extended_wait (struct process_inf
>
> /* Normally we will get the pending SIGSTOP. But in some cases
> we might get another signal delivered to the group first.
> - If we do, be sure not to lose it. */
> + If we do get another signal, be sure not to lose the SIGSTOP:
> + when we later get it we'll want to resume. */
> if (WSTOPSIG (status) == SIGSTOP)
> {
> if (stopping_threads)