From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25130 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2008 13:15:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 25122 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Dec 2008 13:15:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:14:34 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C00D10ACD; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:14:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC8B10A53; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:14:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LCZkt-0004dY-VW; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:14:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:15:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] fixes to xmalloc for gdbserver patch Message-ID: <20081216131431.GA17801@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20081216084309.3EDAC1C7A11@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081216084309.3EDAC1C7A11@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:43:09AM -0800, Doug Evans wrote: > Ok to check in? Sure. This is not too pretty... now we have a mix of malloc and xmalloc. But your reasoning makes sense to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery