From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25524 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2008 04:03:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 25515 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Dec 2008 04:03:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:02:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 28452 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2008 04:02:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 10 Dec 2008 04:02:53 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: teawater Subject: Re: [multiprocess PING] Three patches for focus_command and linux-nat target Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:03:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: tromey@redhat.com, "Stan Shebs" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812100402.53290.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00182.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 10 December 2008 03:11:28, teawater wrote: > Sorry to disturb you. Sorry, I've been caught up with other things. > Could you please help me review these patches for multiprocess branch > or give me some advices for it? > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00713.html > This one is for memory leak of focus_command. This bit is Stan's code, but it looks OK to me. > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-12/msg00001.html This is really going in the wrong direction, and probably makes the checkpoints.exp, multi-forks.exp etc. tests bomb out even more. If you can be a bit more patient, I'm trying to find time to clean up a bunch of patches I have here that add proper multi-process support to the native linux target. > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-12/msg00058.html > These ones is for linux-nat target. I'd really like to not extend this hack further. The caller upstack should have switched inferior_ptid itself, and if this is a memory read, trying to read off a proto-inferior, well, we have to decide how to handle it, patches/proposals/questions comming as soon as I find a bit of time. -- Pedro Alves