Re: [patch] Fix a glitch in debugging 32-bit process with 64-bit GDB.

Mark Kettenis
2008-12-11T09:21:30Z

> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:20:37 -0800
> From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com> wrote:
>
> > I think it's pretty clear that BFD is to blame.
>
> Well, may be not a BFD problem after all...
>
> Does the patch below seem reasonable?

Sorry, it doesn't to me:
>
> SW5kZXg6IGRieHJlYWQuYwo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09
> PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09ClJDUyBm
> aWxlOiAvY3ZzL3NyYy9zcmMvZ2RiL2RieHJlYWQuYyx2CnJldHJpZXZpbmcg
> cmV2aXNpb24gMS45OApkaWZmIC11IC1wIC11IC1yMS45OCBkYnhyZWFkLmMK
> LS0tIGRieHJlYWQuYwkxIE9jdCAyMDA4IDE2OjQxOjI3IC0wMDAwCTEuOTgK
> KysrIGRieHJlYWQuYwkxMCBEZWMgMjAwOCAyMjo0MTozNSAtMDAwMApAQCAt
> ODU1LDcgKzg1NSw3IEBAIHN0YWJzX3NlZWsgKGludCBzeW1fb2Zmc2V0KQog
> ICAgIChpbnRlcm4pLm5fdHlwZSA9IGJmZF9oX2dldF84IChhYmZkLCAoZXh0
> ZXJuKS0+ZV90eXBlKTsJCVwKICAgICAoaW50ZXJuKS5uX290aGVyID0gMDsJ
> CQkJCQlcCiAgICAgKGludGVybikubl9kZXNjID0gYmZkX2hfZ2V0XzE2IChh
> YmZkLCAoZXh0ZXJuKS0+ZV9kZXNjKTsgIAkJXAotICAgIGlmIChiZmRfZ2V0
> X3NpZ25fZXh0ZW5kX3ZtYSAoYWJmZCkpCQkJCQlcCisgICAgaWYgKHNpemVv
> ZiAoYmZkX3ZtYSkgPiA0IHx8IGJmZF9nZXRfc2lnbl9leHRlbmRfdm1hIChh
> YmZkKSkJCVwKICAgICAgIChpbnRlcm4pLm5fdmFsdWUgPSBiZmRfaF9nZXRf
> c2lnbmVkXzMyIChhYmZkLCAoZXh0ZXJuKS0+ZV92YWx1ZSk7CVwKICAgICBl
> bHNlCQkJCQkJCQlcCiAgICAgICAoaW50ZXJuKS5uX3ZhbHVlID0gYmZkX2hf
> Z2V0XzMyIChhYmZkLCAoZXh0ZXJuKS0+ZV92YWx1ZSk7CVwK